雅典德语幼儿园/Potiropoulos D

发布于：2023-06-26 17:28:23

German kindergartens in Athens

设计方：Potiropoulos D+L Architects

位置：希腊雅典

分类：教育建筑

内容：实景照片

图片来源：Charalambos Louizidis

图片：30张

摄影师：Charalambos Louizidis

这个案例中的雅典德语幼儿园是与儿童直接相关的高端公共设施，因此十分重要。这栋建筑的建造不仅要惯常地考虑到其用途，还要综合各种因素。比如要考虑到幼儿园学生的活动，还要考虑到通过互动网络涉及到他们的材料符号系统。这种设计是基于建筑空间不理想条件下，不能有效地用几何学知识去衡量、领会它。相反地，它构成了一个人类日常生活中内在的、固有的、变化无常的部分，与个人和社会的“仪式”和活动紧密相连。在这个方面，“手势”的设计是教育方法上的全新突破，它使孩子的大脑和情绪反应活跃了起来，它诠释了“思想”的概念。

拒我们所知，国内已建成的学前教育设施都“中规中矩”。它们在某方面看来似乎正确，即它们所传达的东西是正确的，但它们却没有传达出最重要的东西，反而将其遗漏掉了。它们只注重“逻辑”、“秩序”和“安全”。它们不让小孩跑，不让他们自由的思考，不让他们说话，不让他们进行对比，不让他们探索，就算是单纯的沉思也不让。反正一切“失控”的情形都尽量避免。因此，一个新的要求出现了，即“想别人之未想”，就像E. Grosz写的那样：“跨越现实的鸿沟，去想象一栋建筑。”

译者: 柒柒

The Kindergarten – of the German School of Athens in this case – is the first public building a young child comes in contact with, and hence, attributes to it a dilated importance.The building was addressed during the synthetic approach not merely as function – as by convention we know – but as contributor to the actions of the small pupils, as material semiotic system involved with them through a network of interactive relationships. This is an approach which is based on the stance that architectural space is not idle, that is not sufficient to measure it geometrically in order to understand it.On the contrary, it constitutes an internal, inherent and transformable part of human daily life, closely connected with the social and personal “rituals” and activities. In this perspective, the devising of “gestures” that will give new “displacement” in the educational effort by mobilizing mental and emotional reflexes of the child, describes the conceptual axis of the “idea”.

The established “neutral” proposals for preschool facilities that we know of in our country seem correct in one sense: about what they say; but what they do not say, what they omit, is the most important. They are proposals based on “logic”, “order” and “safety”, but they are not proposals for running, for carefree wandering, for voices, for fruitful “contrasts”, for “hidden facts”, for mere contemplation, for situations “out of control”. Thus, a need emerges: “to think the ‘unthinkable’,” as E. Grosz writes, “to imagine an architecture “outside” the boundaries of until now.”